The plaintiff brought contradictory pleas, alleging the mutations have been each fraudulent and bogus. Onus of Evidence: The courtroom emphasized the onus to prove the genuineness with the reward was upon the beneficiary (plaintiff). In the event the reward was denied, this problem could only be resolved following recording evidence. https://devinyypzt.blogzet.com/the-smart-trick-of-covenants-and-land-use-restrictions-lawyer-in-karachi-near-me-that-nobody-is-discussing-46029794